Is there always fire where there's smoke?
In the open-source community, the rumor that just won't die claims that Microsoft Corp. is funding The SCO Group's legal actions against Linux. On Thursday, those allegations rose again with reports of a memo that links Microsoft with a financial backer of SCO.
The rumors center around a $50 million investment in SCO by the Larkspur, Calif.-based BayStar Capital investment fund last October. At the time, online reports suggested that BayStar, which invests money from a variety of companies, had taken money from Microsoft for the SCO funding. However, in an interview last fall with eWEEK, BayStar officials denied that Microsoft was an investor in this transaction.
The latest twist surfaced Wednesday on the Web with a document that brings into question Microsoft's claim that it had nothing to do with the BayStar Capital funding of SCO—and, by association, of SCO's lawsuits against Linux vendors and users.
The new memo was published to the Web on late Wednesday by open-source advocate Eric Raymond. The memo was picked up by the Slashdot Web site on Thursday morning.
Blake Stowell, SCO's director of communications, acknowledged that the leaked memo is real.
But, Stowell claimed, pundits had mischaracterized the memo's context. "We believe the e-mail was simply a misunderstanding of the facts by an outside consultant who was working on a specific unrelated project to the BayStar transaction and he was told at the time of his misunderstanding. Contrary to the speculation of Eric Raymond, Microsoft did not orchestrate or participate in the BayStar transaction."
Responding to the allegations, a Microsoft spokesman said: "The allegations in the posting are not accurate. Microsoft has purchased a license to SCO's intellectual property, to ensure interoperability and legal indemnification for our customers. The details of this agreement have been widely reported and this is the only financial relationship Microsoft has with SCO. In addition, Microsoft has no direct or indirect financial relationship with BayStar."
The alleged memo, to which Raymond referred as the "Halloween X" memo, is dated October 12, 2003 and penned by Mike Anderer, whom Raymond identifies as a consultant with a company called S2 Strategic Consulting, which has ties to SCO.
S2 had been hired, according to the contract to help "with the formulation and implementation of various options for Intellectual property management." In essence, S2 was to help SCO make money from its IP.
Four days after the alleged memo was distributed, on October 16, 2003, SCO received the $50 million cash infusion from BayStar Capital and other funders.
A number of industry watchers at that time questioned whether Microsoft had any involvement in the $50 million BayStar financing deal. Some pundits noted that by providing SCO with funding, Microsoft and/or other parties would be helping to fuel SCO's lawsuits against Linux vendors and customers, thereby benefiting Windows. Microsoft and BayStar officials both denied that Microsoft was involved in the funding deal in any way.
Source: eweek