Full Version: Evolution vs. Revolution
Sharkface217
Mar 12 2004, 11:20 PM
Ok, this was originally for music only, but many things are affected by both. To answer the following, use numbering.
1. Which has more of an affect on music, Evolution or Revolution. The Beatles were the ultimate Revolution, because they didnt really play anything extrodinary. Hendrix was the ultimate Evolution, with the guitar fires, extreame notes, and playing with his feet, his work is heard in almost every modern rock song. Which had a bigger impact on music? The Beatles soft lyrics and simple notes, or Hendrix "stuff". Or do they both contribute equally?
2. In life in general, which works out better in the long run, Evolution or Revolution? Are they equally important?
3. In life, do more things happen by Evolution or Revolution (easiest to answer, probably)?
I will post my opinions later, on a different post.
Sharkface217
shortkid33433
Mar 13 2004, 05:10 PM
i picked revolution. revolution has to occur for evolution. there is no evolution without revolution. if u look at music's history that is generally wat has happened.
Sharkface217
Mar 13 2004, 05:50 PM
QUOTE (shortkid33433 @ Mar 13 2004, 05:10 PM) |
i picked revolution. revolution has to occur for evolution. there is no evolution without revolution. if u look at music's history that is generally wat has happened. |
Yes, but without Evolution, the Revolution never happens. But this would turn into a Chicken or Egg argument.
shortkid33433
Mar 22 2004, 08:44 PM
yeah....it kinda goes both ways...
Sharkface217
Mar 24 2004, 09:09 PM
QUOTE (shortkid33433 @ Mar 22 2004, 08:44 PM) |
yeah....it kinda goes both ways... |
Hence, the Chicken or the Egg?
Blitzkreig
Mar 27 2004, 07:11 PM
the egg came first, but thats besides the point. tru point is they are an equal factor
Tracidini
Mar 27 2004, 07:13 PM
wait, and how exactly do you know that the egg came before the chicken?
Blitzkreig
Mar 27 2004, 08:02 PM
amniotic eggs came from lizards and dinosaurs before birds walked the earth.
Sharkface217
Mar 27 2004, 09:00 PM
I would have to agree with nurgle, unless they mutated after birth into chickens (certain frogs can do that, the human turn is himaphradite (sp?)!!!
Blitzkreig
Mar 27 2004, 10:26 PM
heheh that is a possiblility

you can never rule out some thing for sure but ill stick with my opinon
Sharkface217
May 28 2004, 05:23 PM
QUOTE (Blitzkreig @ Mar 27 2004, 10:26 PM) |
heheh that is a possiblility you can never rule out some thing for sure but ill stick with my opinon
|
Lol, sure.
There is the possiblity of Devolution, basically that single-celled organizms mutated into lesser-evolved multi-cellular orginisms..................
This would explain why each generation seems to get dumber and dumber, and the music suckier and suckier..........
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.