Welcome. Mouse over the links above to navigate.
Color Picker FreedomsNet Home Board Index IRC chat (via mIRC)

Welcome Guest ( | Register )

3 Pages  1 2 3 >     Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+
Closed TopicStart new topicStart Poll
Do you want to bomb Iran?, A Green Eggs and Ham Parody.
Track this topic | Email this topic | Print this topic
Sharkface217
post May 8 2004, 03:34 PM
Post #1


500 Posts!
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 874
Joined: March 7, 04
Member No.: 56



http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.com/bomb_iran.html

Made by Maddox, the coolest Pirate in the world.

Link to his main site:

www.thebestpageintheuniverse.com


Talk about the poem here, and about bombing Iran. I mean, it only next door to Iraq..............
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
krayvis
post May 8 2004, 07:42 PM
Post #2


Devil's Advocate
Group Icon

Group: Super Mods
Posts: 715
Joined: October 24, 03
From: Oh, about a few million millimeters from where you are.
Member No.: 11



hmm, a few things to say:
1. Awesome poem, it beats shakespere
2. Bombing w/o justification will make america a hated world policeman
3. Unless we can totally remove Islam, it's not safe to p/o the Muslims
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
The_Nightshift
post May 8 2004, 11:30 PM
Post #3


FreedomsNet Founder | suprema lex erus voluntas est
Group Icon

Group: Owners
Posts: 1,018
Joined: October 4, 03
From: Somewhere between New York and Pennsylvania
Member No.: 1



totally remove islam eh...careful with the religious stuff, it can be offensive to certain people. its also dangerous to globalize...most muslims aren't the sort of radicals that are in the various islamic terrorist orginizations.

In fact, the argument could be made that the same sort of globalizations are the reason that the USA and other nations have problems with islamic terrorists in the first place. I would also like to remind the group that FreedomsNet is not affiliated with any one nation, so don't globalize its community either, we are as abundant and diverse a group as we can manage at this time
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
YamiBattousai
post May 9 2004, 10:49 AM
Post #4


“`à‚̐l‚ÌŽEŠQŽÒ
Group Icon

Group: Site Admin
Posts: 487
Joined: October 22, 03
From: Japan
Member No.: 5



We've had this argument in Making of the Modern World... the argument of Jihad. As we've said in class Jihad is struggle, not war or something like that... A struggle can be a war and some Muslims look at it that way... I'm not going to say the Muslims are bad because some of them are good and others are bad and we shouldn't classify all Muslims under the category of violent.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Blitzkreig
post May 10 2004, 06:02 PM
Post #5


Fulmineus-Oceanus


Group: Blitzkreig
Posts: 1,440
Joined: March 3, 04
From: The U.S. Virgin Islands hoping Prof. Sigma does not find me... Oh crap. I mean New Jersey!
Member No.: 55



yes and dr. susse sux. but honestly krayvis i dont think you ment to come off as racist but pleas re word it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
krayvis
post May 14 2004, 08:44 PM
Post #6


Devil's Advocate
Group Icon

Group: Super Mods
Posts: 715
Joined: October 24, 03
From: Oh, about a few million millimeters from where you are.
Member No.: 11



okay, here it is... R.A.N.T. 2.0:

America should not act for their ideas of defense which are nothing more than ethnocentric ideas of order, Bush should have a council of Cultural Anthropologists to consult before doing things that could potentially annoy ethnic, racial (race is a false concept), cultural, and political groups.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MiKe EaTs FoOd
post May 14 2004, 09:41 PM
Post #7


my @#$% are itchy
Group Icon

Group: Mods
Posts: 206
Joined: October 23, 03
From: jerzee
Member No.: 8



cultural anthropologists? wow.........well now that i think about it i suppose that would definitely help..........it would make it much simpler if we just forced everybody to follow the same ethnicity, the same politics, the same religions, the same everything...and just torture and kill all who defy it....but i suppose that's going a little too far......or is it? *evil smirk*....no but seriously, has bush ever even considered peace talks? i mean i don't follow news whatsoever, even tho i'm in a journalism class, so i dunno what goes on at all...but that would make the most sense to me....well now come to think of it, settling agreements has never really helped us before.....let's just nuke 'em like we did japan! that sure as heck stopped japan from attacking us
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Sharkface217
post May 15 2004, 12:35 PM
Post #8


500 Posts!
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 874
Joined: March 7, 04
Member No.: 56



QUOTE (MiKe EaTs FoOd @ May 14 2004, 09:41 PM)
cultural anthropologists? wow.........well now that i think about it i suppose that would definitely help..........it would make it much simpler if we just forced everybody to follow the same ethnicity, the same politics, the same religions, the same everything...and just torture and kill all who defy it....but i suppose that's going a little too far......or is it? *evil smirk*....no but seriously, has bush ever even considered peace talks? i mean i don't follow news whatsoever, even tho i'm in a journalism class, so i dunno what goes on at all...but that would make the most sense to me....well now come to think of it, settling agreements has never really helped us before.....let's just nuke 'em like we did japan! that sure as heck stopped japan from attacking us

................

Well, oh, o.............k...........



Ya, well, nukes have gone out of style. Race (a false concept, pointed out to me by Krayvis) is a messy business. The problem is that some people have:


A. Prejudces
B. Are the Mutts, as to say they are "everything" (I am, more of less)
C. The Media make you braindead
D. Most peoples "BS (instead of saying bad word) Dectector" is so un-keen because we are bombarded by false junk from commercials, internet, tv, whatever

The "nuking" of Japan was more of less nessicary, we couldnt bomb them with trash-cans (compared to modern bombs) willed with napalm or gunpowder. It peacefully ended a long war (from USA point of view) and actually did a lot of good. I mean, instead of repairing Europe in 30 years, we could fix Japan fast because their main cities were just holes in the ground and/or bombed out too-broken-to-fix buildings. That, coupled with a some earthquakes, made Japan so US friendly and rich, that we have loads of military bases there and, in the Korean War, we sent soldiers to Japan on holidays! From bombed out city to state-of-the-art country in 6 years! Japan is now one of the leading countries in every field, from science to military, to the economical standpoints in our current world. "Nuking" is not something to be taken lightly.


Sorry for me being long winded (I hope Blitz doenst post a 2 sentence post after this one :P :P :P ),



Sharkface217| Always long winded
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
The_Nightshift
post May 15 2004, 02:49 PM
Post #9


FreedomsNet Founder | suprema lex erus voluntas est
Group Icon

Group: Owners
Posts: 1,018
Joined: October 4, 03
From: Somewhere between New York and Pennsylvania
Member No.: 1



Ok...this is an interesting question: was it fair for the US to drop the first two atomic bombs on Japan? Its one that many historians have battled over for decades, and it brings up a good point: is one life worth more than another, and if so, then how can you make decisions that will cost some lives on the premace of saving other's? And its a question that calls practicly every scruple in any person into question...probably one of the most contraversial questions out there.

However, bringing this up is, admitedly, off topic * The_Nightshift slaps self for encouraging off-topic-ness
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Sharkface217
post May 15 2004, 10:01 PM
Post #10


500 Posts!
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 874
Joined: March 7, 04
Member No.: 56



QUOTE (The_Nightshift @ May 15 2004, 02:49 PM)
Ok...this is an interesting question: was it fair for the US to drop the first two atomic bombs on Japan? Its one that many historians have battled over for decades, and it brings up a good point: is one life worth more than another, and if so, then how can you make decisions that will cost some lives on the premace of saving other's? And its a question that calls practicly every scruple in any person into question...probably one of the most contraversial questions out there.

However, bringing this up is, admitedly, off topic * The_Nightshift slaps self for encouraging off-topic-ness

Lol, when you go Off Topic, it not going off topic. It more like "extended disscussion"


I believe that we should bomb Iran, just for the heck of it. Did you know they watch American tv (even though it illegal)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MiKe EaTs FoOd
post May 15 2004, 10:35 PM
Post #11


my @#$% are itchy
Group Icon

Group: Mods
Posts: 206
Joined: October 23, 03
From: jerzee
Member No.: 8



QUOTE
Ok...this is an interesting question: was it fair for the US to drop the first two atomic bombs on Japan? Its one that many historians have battled over for decades, and it brings up a good point: is one life worth more than another, and if so, then how can you make decisions that will cost some lives on the premace of saving other's? And its a question that calls practicly every scruple in any person into question...probably one of the most contraversial questions out there


it's not that we're more important humans than they are...but if we didn't kill them first, then we would've killed them later, but in the mean time they would've killed us a little...therefore MORE lives would've been lost.....this was the quickly and most life-conserving way to do it...and i don't care if it's out of style WE NEED TO FRIGGIN BOMB THEM!!! i mean what's the harm in nuking the desert areas where they might be hiding in caves? the only people we would hurt are the guys we want to kill anyway.......
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Moril
post May 16 2004, 02:57 PM
Post #12


Agent
Group Icon

Group: Super Mods
Posts: 417
Joined: November 3, 03
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (Sharkface217 @ May 15 2004, 10:01 PM)
I believe that we should bomb Iran, just for the heck of it. Did you know they watch American tv (even though it illegal)

Violence only serves to beget more violence. The war in Iraq created even more Middle Eastern unrest - do you want the whole world to unite against the United States? If George Bush had his way, that's what would happen.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
YamiBattousai
post May 16 2004, 03:41 PM
Post #13


“`à‚̐l‚ÌŽEŠQŽÒ
Group Icon

Group: Site Admin
Posts: 487
Joined: October 22, 03
From: Japan
Member No.: 5



Atomic bombs would also make the world's volcanoes very unstable...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Sharkface217
post May 16 2004, 05:40 PM
Post #14


500 Posts!
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 874
Joined: March 7, 04
Member No.: 56



QUOTE (Moril @ May 16 2004, 02:57 PM)
QUOTE (Sharkface217 @ May 15 2004, 10:01 PM)
I believe that we should bomb Iran, just for the heck of it. Did you know they watch American tv (even though it illegal)

Violence only serves to beget more violence. The war in Iraq created even more Middle Eastern unrest - do you want the whole world to unite against the United States? If George Bush had his way, that's what would happen.


Who did you quote for the violence thing? And Moril, you of all people should not forget this: Dubya had his way. :P :P :P


Volcanoes??? You mean oil. If Middle East radioactive, then the world would end (more or less), cause everything is oil based. THis gives me an idea................
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
The_Nightshift
post May 16 2004, 07:27 PM
Post #15


FreedomsNet Founder | suprema lex erus voluntas est
Group Icon

Group: Owners
Posts: 1,018
Joined: October 4, 03
From: Somewhere between New York and Pennsylvania
Member No.: 1



while the middle east is the world's major source of oil, its not the only source of it in the world
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
« Next Oldest · Controversial Topics · Next Newest »

3 Pages  1 2 3 >
Closed TopicTopic OptionsStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: April 26, 2005 - 07:21 AM